CPSCount Editorial Policy

CPSCount articles are written to answer practical search intent: what a score means, how a test works, how a game is played, or how a piece of input hardware affects the result. This policy explains how we choose topics, use sources and update pages.

What we publish

We focus on click speed, reaction time, mouse and keyboard behavior, monitor checks, quick browser games and simple game strategy. We avoid pretending that casual browser tests are medical diagnostics or laboratory-grade measurements. When a page gives ranges or benchmarks, it should explain the setup assumptions behind them.

How pages are written

Each article should answer the main question early, then give enough context for a reader to make a better decision. A useful CPS article should explain technique and safety, not only repeat keywords. A useful hardware article should separate mouse switches, firmware, debounce, browser timing and user technique instead of blaming one thing for every problem.

Sources and external links

We add external links when they help verify facts, explain standards or point to original material. For example, game history pages should link to official game pages or credible history sources when possible, and latency pages should cite serious hardware or platform explanations. We do not add random high-authority links just to look important.

Updates and corrections

Pages are updated when tools change, articles are expanded, links break, or better sources become available. Readers can report mistakes at support@cpscount.com. If a page includes a claim that depends on current records, leaderboard data or product behavior, it should be phrased carefully unless it has been freshly verified.

Helpful-content checklist

• Does the page answer the query clearly?
• Does it explain limits and edge cases?
• Does it link to the relevant CPSCount tool or game?
• Does it cite outside sources when factual claims need support?
• Would a reader bookmark, share or return to the page?

Reference

We use search-engine guidance such as Google Search Central's people-first content guidance as a quality check, but the primary standard is whether the page helps a real visitor.